A spring filled with an extra serving of doc coursework (it seemed like a good idea at the time) and a busier than usual family spring sports calendar has resulted in a few unanticipated outcomes; more take out for dinner, an increased reliance on Amazon Prime for mundane shopping needs and a very sad looking blog.
Yet thanks to Scoop.it, I now can easily, and efficiently, share my “Fab Finds” via Twitter, WordPress, Facebook etc. all while being a curator for my own personal content collections. I come across many Fab Finds each week, but the publishing of these have suffered. I’ve been wanting an easier way to quickly share and item without compromising quality within the post. Scoop.it makes it easy for anyone to publish a link to multiple social media sites while organizing them nicely for continued reference and sharing.
I know Scoop.it isn’t the first site out there to claim such wonderful powers, however Scoop.it is the first site for me that adds some zip into my daily work of mining the interwebs on a variety of Ed Tech, eLearning, k12 and higher education related content.
When you create collections Scoop.it attempts to find additional sites based on the tags you have assigned to your topics. This is a well-intended feature but not its strength. The power is in the Scoop.it bookmarklet that you place on your browser bar so you can scoop as you go. If you are looking for a curating resource that has a powerful and accurate,social search, I recommend Storify.
Scoop.it is in beta, but I did receive my invite in less than 12 hours upon requesting one. Check it out today!
In essence, I think the mashup is a compelling example of why media literacy should be an essential part of education (k-12 and higher education.) As educators create and share digital resources for use in the classroom, we have the opportunity to model best uses and create some effective mashups of our own. Also our students are creating more and more of their own digital content and a mashup can be an excellent project.
A couple of years ago I remember getting asked a lot about mashups. What were they? How do you make one? Now, in 2011, mashups are commonplace on the web. Yet this does not mean we (the everyday web surfer) is more cognizant of what mashups are all about. So I decided to dust off one of my earlier attempts at explaining the basic mashup (see below) as I find it a relevant, evolving media form.
Most of the time you might not even realize a website you are browsing might really be a blend of different apps and content being brought together for a seamless experience. This is could be considered a classic mashup. When you get down to it, isn’t your iGoogle page a type of mashup?
There are some amazing creations that come from mashups, especially with music and video. This is where mashups can be controversial and the intellectual property and copyright is tricky to navigate. (For more on IP and copyright I recommend teachingcopyright.org) In essence, I think the mashup is a compelling example of why media literacy should be an essential part of education (k-12 and higher education.) As educators create and share digital resources for use in the classroom, we have the opportunity to model best uses and create some effective mashups of our own. Also our students are creating more and more of their own digital content and a mashup can be an excellent project.
Below is the first part of a posting I wrote back in 2008 for my department’s blog on introducing the basic concept of the mashup to newbies. Look for part II on creating mashups tomorrow.
Understanding the Mashup -Part I
We’ve received a few inquires this fall about what mashups are and how they might be used in a course. The origin of the mashup is rooted in the music industry where people bring together instrumentation and vocal tracks from different songs to create a new song. Listen to an example of the classic Petula Clark song Downtown merged with the current Russian band t.A.T.u’s Not Gonna Get Us to form the new song Not Gonna Get Us Downtown.
The technical definition of a mashup refers to a website that brings together features, functions, and content of different websites into one tool or page. So essentially, a mashup is something that has been created from many other existing things to form a uniquely new thing, usually a piece of media or website.
Still scratching your head? That’s okay, so was I when I started reading more about mashups. The terminology and definition can seem more cumbersome than actually experiencing a mashup. Once you see one, you begin to realize that mashups are all around us. Here are some examples:
Flicker Sudoku –http://flickrsudoku.com/ The perfect site for sudoku fans and Flicker users alike, this site allows you to play sudoku with other members of the Flicker site, while pulling in content and sudoku boards from other sites. You experience the site as a normal, single webpage. In actuality it’s a site made of many sites and features.
Weather Bonk-http://www.weatherbonk.com/ Weather bonk is an interactive map pulling data from the National Weather Service, Google Maps, and other media sources. The site provides an interactive map of your region which gives you real-time weather, traffic, and sometime visual/image data. At same time, the site is very graphically busy and can be an example of the downside of the mashup.
Video mashups are abundant. YouTube features many of them, and they are popular creations on comedy shows like the Daily Show. In an election year the variety and numbers of video mashups are vast. Below is a clip produced by an individual that was posted on YouTube. Notice the variety of images and clips ranging from Hillary Clinton speaking, a Nike ad runner, infused with George Orwell’s 1984:
Part II: How do I create a Mashup? Basic mashups do not require expensive computer equipment or software. The most important resource in mashup creation is creativity and to keep in mind to start simple and build from there. In the next posting we will talk more about how to build a mashup using basic tools like PowerPoint.
14th Annual Academic Technology Institute Request for Proposals
Each year I run an internal Technology & eLearning Institute for Lesley faculty and academic staff. This year we are want to open it up to regional presenters from other Boston schools and educational organizations. Below is our RFP and link to apply to present at the Institute. Presenters get free registration. We are unable to support transportation costs, etc.
The Institute provides three session formats -A traditional presentation, a BYOL (bring your own laptop) for skills training or how-to’s and a digital poster session. Digital poster sessions are like traditional posters, except we provide you a data projector for you to display your work. Traditional posters are also welcome.
If you have any questions please contact me at rpeterse [at] lesley [dot] edu.
RFP Guidelines and Submission Form
Faculty and Academic Administrators and educators from the broader community are invited to submit proposals to present at Lesley’s 14th Annual Academic Technology Institute to be held on Wednesday, January 19th from 9am-4pm in University Hall. The day will feature a variety of sessions ranging from traditional presentations, to hands-on demonstrations, to digital poster sessions. Please consider sharing your work, whether it is a specific assignment from a course, or perhaps research you are currently engaged in.
Some examples of presentation topics and formats include:
Innovative uses of media and technology in teaching and scholarship
Teaching and learning with mobile devices
Fostering engagement, collaboration, and communication with/through technology
Exploration of trends in social media
Assessment and reflection using digital media
Next Generation and Millennial Learning Needs and Styles
Poster presentations on research or teaching related to the use of digital media or instructional uses of media in face-to-face, hybrid, and online environments
Presentations may be as a group or individual. Presenters will select one of the following presentation formats to share:
Traditional Concurrent Session: These are presentations or discussions of a topic or concept (60 minutes).
Bring Your Own Laptop (BYOL): These are presentations that encourage hands-on exploration of specific websites or tools. Participants will bring their own laptops to participate.
Digital Poster Session: Presentations held at the end of the day, in a poster-style format, utilizing projection and traditional mediums to present a concept, idea, or specific piece of work and research
We might be able to offer one or two Skyped-in or Elluminate presentations. If you are interested in this option, please contact me directly to discuss.
I seem to be on a data visualization kick this week. Yesterday I highlighted the coolness of Many Eyes for text analysis. On the same day one of my favorite tweeps, @ToughLoveforX, shared Revisit, a project by Moritz Stefaner who is a freelance “information visualizer.” As soon as I clicked on Revisit, I was smitten from both my visual data geek tendencies and as an educator.
Stefaner’s Revisit allows you to “see” the connections happening across various Twitter streams and hashtags. As a professional development provider and educator, Twitter is one of those tools that can take a while for someone to get the gist of (See earlier post on DABEL model for Social Media PD). One of the common complaints I hear from my students and colleagues is that Twitter is so hard to follow. Often I will introduce TweetDeck or Twitterfall (etc), as helpful tools to follow the progression of conversations. Some of my students and workshop attendees will then “get it” a bit more, but there is always a group of visual learners that are really trying to conceptualize the relationships of the tweets; particularly retweets and how people are truly connected. This is where Revisit is particularly powerful.
I did a sample infographic of the #edchat hashtag from 8/7/2010 at 11:30am EST. Click here to interact with this example (give it about 3 seconds to load). Also note, to the right of the Revisit screen, you can also type in your own search terms.
Stefaner comments this as a great way to create a Twitter wall for conferences, offices, and I would propose classrooms as well. Imagine visualizing your backchannel conversations in this way and seeing the connections come to life, as well as visualizing the major influencers and branches in the dialogue.
Individuals and organizations can download the source code for their own stand alone implementations. Stefaner does note that due to current API limitations the only the tweets from the last 8 days are captured and retweets via the Twitter website are not captured. However, as an immediate infographic and quick analysis tool, it’s very effective. I invite you all to Revisit, and see your Twitter experiences in a new way.
This post talks about how wordle can be used to rethinking and visualize the main ideas of reading. Examples from “A Nation at Risk” and “A Blueprint for Ed Reform” are used.
The amount of blogging time I have is pretty much 0-2% these days. After work, I devote my idle hours to doctoral studies and family (and sadly in that order some days).
One thing about graduate work is the volume of print reading has not changed since I was in my Master’s program in 98-99. Darn. Synthesizing lots and lots of text quickly is a challenge for anyone. As a teacher educator, I am always demonstrating the use of certain tools to help organize and visualize text and data for k12 students. So wouldn’t it be a novel idea to actually use some myself? I imagine anyone reading this might be saying –well golly yes– you just realized that?
I’ve been using Wordle a bit more to validate (or invalidate) perceptions of readings, especially articles that I have read before and already have formed strong value statements about. In my summer Historical Perspectives on Education course, we were assigned the classic A Nation At Risk report from 1983. I was feeling a bit more sour than usual about ed reform. Chatter in the online discussion of my course turned to a bit of griping that not much has changed in our reform rhetoric since 1983. After completing a Worlde for #edchat this morning, I began to wonder if perhaps Wordle could help me see and perceive our impressions of a Nation at Risk differently, especially in comparison to a current policy document? If our class believed nothing had changed, we should see more similarities than differences between the two. In my mini-experiment I selected the recommendations section from A Nation At Risk, and compared it to the recommendations of the recent Blue Print for Reform for the reauthorization of the ESEA. Here is what happened:
Wordle Recommendations Section from a Nation At Risk (1983)
I haven’t had chance to do a comprehensive analysis of each Worlde. Here are just some quick reactions:
That students were the most commonly used word in both reports. While we may not agree with the rhetoric in one or both of the documents, students are clearly at the center.
Support is a huge theme in our current ed reform rhetoric and it was not even on the map in At Risk.
A Nation At Risk is focused on k-12, with emphasis on teachers and students and preparing teachers.
Blueprint expands our thinking and focus; administrators and districts are mentioned frequently. Mentions of parents and community also appear.
Teachers are integral to both reports. But, the focus on teacher preparation through universities in the At-Risk report is not the core focus of the Blue Print recommendations.
Hmmm where did learning go in the Blue Print?
In the Blue Print, schooling is focused on preparing us for college, not just successful graduation from high school.
At Risk focused on the “Basics” that students need to master. Standards appear to be our new basics.
Content based knowledge mentioned throughout the at risk. New reform rhetoric focused more on accountability and performance.
Heavy focus on nationalism in At-risk and national status.
I am glad I did this little exercise. We are inundated with so much information online, I know I am scanning my content more and forming assumptions and opinions quickly. While I didn’t walk away thinking “Wow, we’ve really changed! Reform now is soooo much better,” it helped me clarify my thinking and even rethink how I approach discussing this with my classmates. Even though I had read At Risk many times, there is something intangibly powerful about visualizing the main themes of the text in a new way. And, because I am not getting any more free time to read, I did as I tell my teachers to do with their students: I stepped back, utilized a tool designed to assist and enhance my understanding.
For any readers out there; do you ever Wordle, or use another tool, to help you with our own personal work and learning? This little exercise got me wondering about how often as educators we use the same tools we give our students for our own personal learning and reflection?
I have about three to six blog post ideas a day. I don’t know if this is low, average, insanely high, or reveals a touch of narcissism? They come to me at random moments; weeding a flower bed, not paying attention during a committee meeting, or scraping some type of mysterious goo off kids’ playroom floor. I take the decent ideas and place them in my wordpress draft pile, aka “topic purgatory.” I’ve been trying to find a moment to write something semi-literate on one of these, yet purgatory is just getting more crowded.
I started the blog to create a collection of ideas and develop my writing a bit more. If I was grading myself I could get at least a 50% if I had published the list of topics! I’d rather not offer up all of the reasons I’ve been a tad lame at my posting pattern. I have not mastered the teaching-doctoral student-administrator-wife-mom thing. Blogging, with laundry, has taken a back seat. The good news is my husband is fine with doing laundry. He’s not so keen on taking the blogging.
I really want to write because it helps me think through all that clutter of ideas and thoughts I read via twitter, other blogs, journals, and conversations. So I thought, why not poll any interested souls on some of the topics you think are worthy of more blog coverage? I don’t really have an expectation that I will have huge numbers of replies, but I do appreciate the feedback.
Below is a poll with a list of topics plucked off the purgatory list. Please chime in, or add your own idea.
If you are big fan of collaboration or need to figure out a way to do more dynamic sharing of content online, then you will want to take a peak at Stixy. Described by one colleague as “Google Docs meets Voicethread, meets a wiki,” Stixy offers a unique collaboration platform for a variety of content and media file types.
I am both a heavy user of Google Docs and Voicethread in my professional work and teaching. Stixy seems to have the potential to fill a niche gap between the two –allowing document sharing, editing, commenting and collaboration. It allows different file types for posting and provides different options to mark up the screen and provide feedback to the author/presenter.
With versatility comes a loss of simplicity that is Google docs and Voicethread. Stixy’s user interface could be a bit more streamlined, and clearer to the “everyday” internet user. However, after playing around for a short while, you will soon get the hang of the site.
Stixy is currently free and in beta. As with many new Web 2.0 sites, it’s hard to tell how long the beta will last, however it is still worth exploring and trying out.
I am curious if anyone out there is using Stixy with students yet? Something for business? I am playing with different ideas on how to use it in my next online course this summer and this seems to be a nice tool for students to collaborate and share their research projects through. When I figure out exactly how I will be introducing Stixy to students, I’ll post more details. Until then, enjoy!